Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - oklajohn

Pages: [1]
1
UCheck / Re: Malwarebytes Update to 4.2.12?
« on: March 22, 2020, 09:03:27 pm »
This same thing seems to be happening again.   MalwareBytes version 4.2.12 is showing as an update again on UCheck but is nowhere to be found at MalwarBytes.  Could this still be Beta?  Thanks.

2
UCheck / Re: Malwarebytes Update to 4.2.12?
« on: March 15, 2020, 03:27:58 pm »
Same problem here.  UCheck reporting MBAM 4.1.0.56 has been updated, but I can't find it.  Glad you are fixing it. Thanks.

3
UCheck / Re: Mailbird Update Problem
« on: October 30, 2019, 08:15:13 pm »
One other thing I just noticed.  SuMo is showing my installed version of Mailbird is up-to-date with 2.71,the same as Mailbird is showing.  Really not sure why Windows 10 is still showing 2.70. Will still let you know if I find out the solution.   Update:  Found my Mailbird file was probably corrupted.  Re-installed and all is well now with Mailbird and UCheck.  Not a problem of your program at all.  I apologize.  I really appreciate your concern and replies,Curson.  Thanks, John

4
UCheck / Re: Mailbird Update Problem
« on: October 30, 2019, 07:55:34 pm »
Thanks, I have contacted Mailbird to see if they might be of help with this.  Will post here if they provide any helpful info.   

5
UCheck / Re: Mailbird Update Problem
« on: October 30, 2019, 07:21:27 pm »
Thanks Curson for your reply.  I checked the item in add/uninstall and it shows Version 2.7.0, the same as UCheck.   Sorry I didn't check that  first.  I just looked at Mailbird and it indicates 2.7.1 is installed.  Obviously, the problem is Mailbird, not UCheck.  Sorry for the inconvenience of the post.

6
UCheck / Mailbird Update Problem
« on: October 30, 2019, 02:54:50 pm »
UCheck is showing I have Mailbird 2.7.0 installed, and update to 2.7.1 is available.  However, Mailbird shows I have 2.7.1 already installed.  How can I correct this?  Thanks, John

Pages: [1]